In brief
Fixing a website built with an AI builder (Wix, Webnode and similar) that brings no inquiries: I review copy, proof, visibility and measurement and finish the site to a state customers trust. It is for businesses that launched a site with AI and don't want to start over; if a fix doesn't make economic sense, I say so upfront. The audit with a verdict costs €200 and is credited against follow-up work, finishing the site from €600.
| Plan | Price | Scope | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audit with a verdict | from €200 | 5 key pages, video, verdict | within 3 days |
| Finishing the site | from €600 | fixed scope based on the audit | per the audit |
| New custom website | from €800 | React/Next.js, content and URLs carried over | by scope |
Finished in front, empty behind
A builder ships a page that looks finished at a glance. That is the problem: you cannot tell there is nothing behind it. What is missing is copy about your company, your own photos, a base for Google, and measurement, without which you cannot tell whether the site works or merely exists.
- 01you write what bothers you about the site
- 02I look at what is missing behind it, not at how it looks
- 03copy, photos, SEO and measurement added
- 04I answer within 48 hours
The demo shows an illustrative site of a made-up company, not a real client. The builder code shows what such a site lacks. Real work is in the portfolio.
- BRIEF: What the page must earn, Who it is for, Content, copy, assets, What competitors do, Scope and deadline
- DESIGN: Grid and layout, Type scale, Colour and states, Mobile version, Prototype to sign off
- CODE: Next.js components, Responsive down to 320 px, Forms and validation, Speed and Core Web Vitals, Accessibility and SEO base
- LAUNCH: Domain, hosting, certificate, GA4 and Search Console, Indexing and sitemap, Backups and updates, 30 days of support
Diagram in four steps: the builder page looks finished, behind it code with generic copy and a form that sends nowhere, the code gets filled in and the site starts working.
What you actually get
No fog: what you get, who it fits and where a larger scope begins.
Clear deliverables
- a pass over the AI-generated website and a list of what is broken
- a verdict on whether it is worth finishing or rebuilding
- fixes for what generators leave outmetadata, sitemap, redirects
- Search Console and GA4 connected so there is something to measure
- fixes to forms, mobile, speed and accessibility
Best fit
- you have a website from an AI tool and are not sure what to do with it
- it looks finished but no inquiries arrive and Google cannot see it
- you want an impartial verdict before spending on a new website
Not a fit
- you want to hear that everything is fine
- you have no access to the website or the domain
- the website works and you are only after a redesign
Scope boundaries
An audit with a verdict costs €200 and you get it even if my recommendation is to throw the website away. Finishing the website from €600 covers fixes where the foundation is worth keeping. A new bespoke website from €800 is the route when repairing costs more than rebuilding. The audit fee is deducted if we continue.
Three paths by verdict
It starts with an audit, because without one any repair quote would be guesswork. The audit fee is credited if we go ahead with the work.
Starting was the right call
You can launch an AI-built website over a weekend and it looks decent. That's nothing to apologise for, starting beats the many companies still "sorting out" their website in year three. A few weeks later, though, one question shows up: why aren't any inquiries coming in?
The answer is almost always the same, and it has nothing to do with AI writing it. What's missing is copy that speaks about the customer, proof (real photos, references), the site isn't properly visible in search, and nobody is measuring how many people arrive and where they drop off. No builder does those four things for you.
So I don't start by tearing anything down. First I look at what already works and tell you straight whether targeted fixes are enough or a rebuild makes sense, even if the answer is that your current site is fine for now.
What an AI website usually lacks
Four things that separate a launched website from one that brings customers. I tackle them in this order, because that's the order in which they matter.
- 01
Offer and customer-facing copy
A builder writes grammatically correct but generic text. The test: swap your company name for a competitor's, if it still fits, it isn't describing you. I rewrite it around the customer's problem, scope and price.
- 02
Proof and credibility
Customers spot stock photography instantly. I put in your real work, references with names, and figures you can defend. Nothing invented, no fake reviews or numbers.
- 03
Visibility in search
Titles, page structure, indexing, Google Business Profile. A site existing isn't the same as people finding it. I check what Google knows about you and fill in the gaps.
- 04
Measurement
Without analytics you can't tell whether the site is working or merely existing. I set up traffic and key-action tracking, form submissions, phone taps.
How it works
No unnecessary bureaucracy. Every step has a clear output and deadline, you always see exactly where we are.
- Typically
- audit within 3 days
- Steps
- 4
Send your website address
48 hTell me what bothers you about it and what you expect from it. Within 48 h I'll say whether an audit is even worth it.
I review it as a customer would
auditOffer, proof, mobile, visibility, measurement, ownership. You get a narrated video and a clear verdict.
Finishing work, fixed scope
deliveryI fix what has measurable impact. Scope and price are set upfront, and the audit fee is credited.
Handover or ongoing care
nextHanded over with a note on what changed and why. If you want to continue, we move to monthly care, no lock-in.
Common questions
The ones asked most. Missing something? Write to me, I reply within a few hours.
Google doesn't penalise AI content automatically, it penalises unhelpful, mass-produced content regardless of whether a human or a machine wrote it. So the problem with builder sites isn't some "AI penalty", it's that generic copy gives neither Google nor people a reason to pick you over a competitor.
Send me your website address.
I'll tell you whether it's worth fixing, rebuilding, or leaving alone. No commitment, no sales pressure, call +420 605 707 036 or e-mail info@le-artist.cz.