Launched a website with AI and the inquiries aren't coming? You don't have to start over. I'll find what's actually missing — copy, proof, visibility, measurement — and finish it to a state customers trust. If a fix doesn't make economic sense, I'll tell you upfront.
I aim for payback in months, not years. I judge it honestly within 6 months.
It starts with an audit, because without one any repair quote would be guesswork. The audit fee is credited if we go ahead with the work.
The price in the quote is final — no surprises.
Launched a website with AI and the inquiries aren't coming? You don't have to start over. I'll find what's actually missing — copy, proof, visibility, measurement — and finish it to a state customers trust. If a fix doesn't make economic sense, I'll tell you upfront.
You can launch an AI-built website over a weekend and it looks decent. That's nothing to apologise for — starting beats the many companies still "sorting out" their website in year three. A few weeks later, though, one question shows up: why aren't any inquiries coming in?
The answer is almost always the same, and it has nothing to do with AI writing it. What's missing is copy that speaks about the customer, proof (real photos, references), the site isn't properly visible in search, and nobody is measuring how many people arrive and where they drop off. No builder does those four things for you.
So I don't start by tearing anything down. First I look at what already works and tell you straight whether targeted fixes are enough or a rebuild makes sense — even if the answer is that your current site is fine for now.
Less vague promise, more concrete delivery. This should quickly show what is included, who the service fits and where a larger scope begins.
The starting price applies to a clearly bounded scope. More pages, integrations, language versions, copywriting, urgent delivery or messy existing systems are quoted separately.
Four things that separate a launched website from one that brings customers. I tackle them in this order, because that's the order in which they matter.
A builder writes grammatically correct but generic text. The test: swap your company name for a competitor's — if it still fits, it isn't describing you. I rewrite it around the customer's problem, scope and price.
Customers spot stock photography instantly. I put in your real work, references with names, and figures you can defend. Nothing invented — no fake reviews or numbers.
Titles, page structure, indexing, Google Business Profile. A site existing isn't the same as people finding it. I check what Google knows about you and fill in the gaps.
Without analytics you can't tell whether the site is working or merely existing. I set up traffic and key-action tracking — form submissions, phone taps.
No unnecessary bureaucracy. Every step has a clear output and deadline — you always see exactly where we are.
Tell me what bothers you about it and what you expect from it. Within 48 h I'll say whether an audit is even worth it.
Offer, proof, mobile, visibility, measurement, ownership. You get a narrated video and a clear verdict.
I fix what has measurable impact. Scope and price are set upfront, and the audit fee is credited.
Handed over with a note on what changed and why. If you want to continue, we move to monthly care — no lock-in.
The ones asked most. Missing something? Write to me – I reply within a few hours.
Google doesn't penalise AI content automatically — it penalises unhelpful, mass-produced content regardless of whether a human or a machine wrote it. So the problem with builder sites isn't some "AI penalty", it's that generic copy gives neither Google nor people a reason to pick you over a competitor.
I'll tell you whether it's worth fixing, rebuilding, or leaving alone. No commitment, no sales pressure — call +420 605 707 036 or e-mail info@le-artist.cz.
Real client results: Notia AS +280 % · MiQueen +210 % traffic
